You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it Others think that school time should be used in learning important subjects Discuss both views and give your opinion Give reas

Essay topics:

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it. Others think that school time should be used in learning important subjects. Discuss both views and give your opinion?

Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

You should write at least 254 words.

It is the true that schools educate learners on a wide range of subjects. Some people say that schools should focus on teaching only important subjects but some think schools should add other coures like food science, cooking in their curriculum. Although I agree with the previous statement about learning necessary topics at schools, I firmly believe that schools should teach science related to foods and cooking to their students.

The students learn about many subjects in achool which shape their mind and help them to decide on which career they want to pursue. It is important because what we learn as a teen sticks to our brain cmpared to what is studied at the later part of life. SO, many parents suggest teachers to focus the topics which will help their children to secure a better life.

Schools already have language, science, business management, sports and many other subjects in their curriculum. Although they are necessary to broaden and to shape one's career, many graduates say what they learned at school did not come handy at later life. It is probably because most students decide on what career to pursue only after passing the school. Similar to driving, cooking is also a basic life skill and schoosl are the institution to learn about the basic life skills which includes cooking as well. Besides, food is something we put in our body and iy controls our health. So, if we teach about food, the students will be more causious about it and may even try to maintain a healthy and balanced diet which is almost absent in a teenager's life style. Moreover, food science is not just about cooking. It deals with a wide range to subjects that focus on the production and preservation of food materials. Additionally, learing about food and cooking opens new doors for the learners, by following which the learners may opt to become a chef or a nutritionist for a career.

As the population of the world is increasing, we are in need of more doctors, more engineers, more political leaders and so on. We also need people who would teach and educate us about the nutrition we need and take. So, it is a high time when schools renew their agenda and add food science in them.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 166, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...y are necessary to broaden and to shape ones career, many graduates say what they le...
^^^^
Line 5, column 747, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teenagers'' or 'teenager's'?
Suggestion: teenagers'; teenager's
...lanced diet which is almost absent in a teenagers life style. Moreover, food science is n...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, may, moreover, so, well

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1820.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 383.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75195822454 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41465664415 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498694516971 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 543.6 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.134817626 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.111111111 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2777777778 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.61111111111 7.06120827912 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 3.4128256513 293% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210028437194 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0679658383211 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0711183848702 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135229134538 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0919960128875 0.056905535591 162% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 50.2224549098 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.