You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Write about the following topic:
Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country, while some people think it is bad. Discuss both views and state your opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
You should write at least 250 words.
Some people believe that being chosen to host a global sports event is a great privilege for any country. Whereas others advocate that these events pose a negative effect. While I am in no opposition to the aforementioned idea, I believe that it does have its benefits that cannot be denied.
The negative implications of being a host of foreign competition are often discussed in terms of two main reasons. First and foremost, having a huge influx of foreigners coming to attend the events, which might not entirely be under control and could lead to friction amongst that community. It may result in a lot of potential risks affecting the security of the public. The second issue is the requirement of high-tech types of equipment and luxurious accommodations to prepare for the event. Undoubtedly, that nation might incur unanticipated hosting costs contributed to decades worth of debt to support the sports event, which may temporarily take a toll on the economy of the host. Indeed, most of the facilities created for the Athens Olympics in 2004 have contributed to Greece’s debt crisis and remain empty.
With that being said, winning a bid for hosting an international sporting competition also has a positive impact on that country, often referred to as economy and tourism. The number of visitors during and after the events has been proven to be a factor in deciding the progress of the economic boom. Additionally, there is an increase in the use of goods, services, and accommodations, which helps that nation to be able to expose to the global market, attracting future business investment. Moreover, via breath-taking scenery in multimedia and advertisement, audiences could have a lasting impression, so that those countries could become an ideal destination after the events conclude. As an example, tourism Australia estimated that the event was set to deliver a boost to the economy of $1 million a day over three weeks in 2015.
To sum up, I am convinced that hosting international sports events is positive for any countries around the world and that everyone's social life could be improved after finishing the competitions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 56, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...ieve that being chosen to host a global sports event is a great privilege for any coun...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 107, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...t is a great privilege for any country. Whereas others advocate that these events pose ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 230, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...opposition to the aforementioned idea, I believe that it does have its benefits t...
^^
Line 2, column 612, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...to decades worth of debt to support the sports event, which may temporarily take a tol...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 792, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...set to deliver a boost to the economy of million a day over three weeks in 2015. ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, moreover, second, so, then, whereas, while, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1796.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10227272727 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95296614259 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579545454545 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 570.6 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6196534771 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.733333333 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4666666667 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15096388204 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0499109035237 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488075845042 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0993633040035 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237720594723 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.