Young people are much more aware of and concerned about issues like the environment poverty and animal welfare than previous generations What is your opinion

Many people believe that nowadays conscious awareness and concern about global issues like that environment, poverty, and animal welfare among young persons are much more than before. Personally, I completely agree with it for various apparent reasons.

To begin with, advances in technology, specially technologies in media make the information about problems that characterized globally and involved the future well-being of human became more abundant and easier to access. For instance, with connection to the Internet which previous generations did not possessed, we can grasp and update generally what is happening anytime at any corner of the world, that ushers us aware more the state of our lives. Another example is that numerous information about global warming, holes in the ozone layer, decrease poverty rate programmes of government, as well as activities of animal rescue organisations are widely broadcasted on the television. As a result, the attention of people levels up significantly.

On the other hand, we can not deny the vital role of modern education. In contrary to the precedent times, nowadays, economic development affair is not emphasised primarily in education, but focus stronger on developing a sustainable life with a highly appreciated well-being. A typical example is the growing trees activity that frequently organised in schools for the time being, which means students are well-educated about environment affair. Furthermore, charity activities to underprivileged communities is not rarely as before and is becoming more and more popular among present-day young people.

In conclusion, thank to the advance of media technologies, and an emphasis transform in education, young person nowadays are much more aware and apprehensive about global matters such as environment, poorness and animal caring than one-time peers.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 304, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'possess'
Suggestion: possess
...rnet which previous generations did not possessed, we can grasp and update generally what...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1590.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69892473118 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08399560509 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641577060932 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.4540553768 49.4020404114 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.545454545 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3636363636 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5454545455 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309416139923 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0952324213824 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115197452208 0.0667982634062 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188162861514 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0980746504856 0.056905535591 172% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 20.72 50.2224549098 41% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.27 8.58950901804 131% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.