Young people prefer listening to music rather than listening to the news on the radio Is this a positive or a negative trend

Essay topics:

Young people prefer listening to music rather than listening to the news on the radio.

Is this a positive or a negative trend?

In contemporary times, the younger generation opts to listen to music than listen to the news. In my point of view, listening to music gives a negative impression on the youth due to detachment to society and unawareness of what is going on in the local, national and global environment.

Music indeed creates a good vibe thus establishing the mood. However, several reasons make it unfavorable, hereafter brings negative indications on the youth, making them mentally and socially unavailable. Firstly, the indifference to society is a red flag that should be pointed out and given importance. For example, most of the time, these age groups isolate themselves to listen to music; instead of catching up with friends and family, they would put on the earphones and get lost in the song. Furthermore, it is an obvious implication of disconnection to the outside world that should be discouraged.

Secondly, it is undeniable that music can be entertaining, whereas news holds to be informative. It is another reason why listening to the news has a positive impact on children. To be well informed is crucial for survival. Consequently, not being updated about any data is detrimental to the overall mental health of this age group. Although some news can be discouraging, it offers instructive entertainment, and ideas, such as business advice, diet for health and fitness and technological discoveries, which the younger generation seems to neglect.

In my conclusion, I believe the choice to listen to music than the news has undesirable effects on the youth. It diminishes the educational substance of these individuals.

Votes
Average: 9.1 (9 votes)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, whereas, for example, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1382.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27480916031 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15938327811 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.610687022901 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.1572206486 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7142857143 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7142857143 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26002161289 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0883396605205 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103178233643 0.0667982634062 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173728706949 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.081238698265 0.056905535591 143% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.