Zoos are inhumane and should be abolished To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion

The idea that, zoos are the symbolic image of unphilanthropic actions and should be removed in the era of equality, remains a source of controversy. While many people approve with this viewpoint, I strongly disagree with this misconception about zoos and other animal protection destinations as a whole because of numerous positive effects they have brought for the sake of both animals and society.
The appearance of zoos can be regarded as the important achievement for several reasons. Firstly, due to the serious natural environmental degradation, various wild animals are not able to exist without adequate source of food and places for sheltering. With the view to preserving and boosting the biodiversity, some kinds of endangered animals are brought up and grow in the man-made living conditions, which is likely to meet animal's basic demands. For example, in African regions, instead of being hunted by inhumane people or lying in the claws of dangerous predators in wildlife, living in zoos can maintain and sustain animal's offspring and also avoid the risk of extinction. Therefore, opposing to misunderstanding of a group of people, zoos are not only as inhumane as they expected but also the ideal living environment for a wide variety of animals.
Furthermore, with the role as a tourist attractive destination, zoos also strengthen people's awareness about animal protection. For example, it is a common tendency that schools are gradually changing their curriculum and pay more attention to practical knowledge. Organizing outdoor activities like zoo tours can stimulate students' curiosity about the natural environment and the vitality of protecting and preserving animals. Thanks to that, children will nurture and promote their sense of sympathy as well as are encouraged to participate in animal protection campaigns. Without the presence of zoos, people will lost a precious opportunity to gain more knowledge about the world around them.
In conclusion, zoos play a crucial role in people's life. I would argue that zoos are not inhumane as exaggerated before and the presence of zoos nowadays is completely essential.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 617, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'lose'
Suggestion: lose
...thout the presence of zoos, people will lost a precious opportunity to gain more kno...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, so, then, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1807.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37797619048 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0175210553 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574404761905 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8191115693 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.071428571 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175827036231 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603827215659 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0503410409274 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119109110231 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0563716581915 0.056905535591 99% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.