Zoos are well known to display heterogeneous collection of animals to people and education them on wild animals. It is one major source to view animals that we don’t get to see everywhere in our daily life. But to what extent Zoos are necessary is disputable. The following essay analyses the various pros and cons of zoos.
Firstly, Wild animals are trapped from their natural habitat and are kept in cages and tiny artificial habitat that is created in the zoo. We see many cases where these wild animals are not taken proper care. They have little space to move around and don’t open live in groups. They are also trapped for years in the zoo. This does not help to preserve the wild animals but willinstead exaggerate the wild life.
On the other hand, many animals that lived hundreds of years ago are not seen any more. Our younger generations might not get to even see the various wild animals that currently exist. One such example is mammoth. These animals lived in the cold climatic conditions and disappeared gradually with the changing weather conditions. Many animals in wild die due to starvation. This can also be avoided in zoos. Additionally, some wild animals like deer have so protection from other wild animals. Animals like lions, tigers kill other animals that live in the forest for their survival. This also can be avoided in zoos.
Alternatively, to preserve animals like tigers that are reducing in number, there are various foundations in different countries. One such organization is black jaguar white tiger. It is different from zoo, here the animals are taken proper care and are also provided with the habitat that they would live in.
In conclusion, zoos are helpful to preserve animals and protect them from various conditions they face in wild but also its necessary to provide proper habitat for them to live.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, so, well, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1557.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94285714286 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48514052045 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48253968254 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.3306622617 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.7727272727 106.682146367 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.3181818182 20.7667163134 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.31818181818 7.06120827912 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193450833904 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0623556351169 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581819415138 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124628298737 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0249400485629 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.0946893788 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.78 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.19 8.58950901804 84% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.