The problem of scarcity of lands has introduced due to increase in population. Although some feel that public places should be replaced with residential areas to facilitate people, I, however, believe that parks are important to maintain equilibrium in the ecosystem.
Firstly, public parks are places where people do outdoor activities. In many countries, lawns are often used by youngsters to play different games, old age uses it for exercise and yoga purpose. These activities help them to stay fit and healthy. Therefore, conversion of public places to cope with the growing population issue can directly negatively impact the health of locals. Moreover, public areas are often used as a socializing medium because people get to know each other due to it. For example, by doing playing cricket in parks, children sometimes came to know their neighbours.
Another reason is that greenery of parks generally mitigates with carbon dioxide. Emission of toxic fumes from the cars often increases the level of carbon dioxide in the environment, so trees are used to generate oxygen from the toxic air. A good illustration of this is the central park of London, where the government has recently planted 100 trees to reduce the carbon footprints.
In conclusion, while some are in favour to use the public places for the economic growth of the nation, however, I think that it will not only create health problems for the locals but also disturb the ecosystem. Therefore, I believe that the government should look for other options to stimulate the local economy rather than the replacement of public places.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 590, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ometimes came to know their neighbours. Another reason is that greenery of parks...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, while, as to, for example, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1354.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1679389313 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66450488294 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.614503816794 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8165882985 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.153846154 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1538461538 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.23076923077 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236681254829 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0722089662791 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0460227091897 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123600917759 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0626028577106 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.