Countries with long average working hours are economically more successful than those countries which do not work long hours. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is widely believed that Nations with longer work hours are more prosperous economically than countries that work for shorter hours. This essay agrees with this view as will be ventilated in this essay.
To begin with, Employees tend to be more productive due to the huge amount of time dedicated to their work. This could be explained as staff completing work which requires a lot of time in a timely manner. For instance, in a some countries, the standard working hours for most companies is 7 hours, but if it is increased to 10 hours or more, targets might be achieved earlier than it is expected. In addition, more work experience can be gained in time, with the young experienced workforce serving as great assets to the country as whole.
Although, working for hours less than the standard working time might help workers achieve a work-life balance and in essence spend more time with their loved ones, it does not benefit the society economically. This is because spending less time at work might lead to reduced output on the part of the employee. This means sufficient time is not invested in their work. Also, few working hours might cause the efficiency of staff to dwindle. In this case, employees with target-based jobs might note meet their targets due to the shortfall in their working hours which could lead to redundancy in future.
In conclusion, while I agree that working for long hours makes staff more efficient and makes available skilled workforce for the country, working for short hours might reduce the productivity and output of the staff.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... as will be ventilated in this essay. To begin with, Employees tend to be more...
^^^
Line 3, column 187, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a timely manner" with adverb for "timely"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...eting work which requires a lot of time in a timely manner. For instance, in a some countries, the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...great assets to the country as whole. Although, working for hours less than th...
^^^
Line 5, column 595, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ng hours which could lead to redundancy in future. In conclusion, while I agree that...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h could lead to redundancy in future. In conclusion, while I agree that workin...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1313.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89925373134 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52696253484 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533582089552 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 387.9 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1681687353 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.416666667 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314594124117 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136177459281 0.084324248473 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.078465465053 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217880935811 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.020744246667 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 50.2224549098 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.