In the developed world, average life expectancy is increasing. What problems which cause individuals and society, suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce the impact of aging populations?
Over the past decades, it is true that the elderly population has become a debatable issue of a large variety of people from all strata on a global scale. It results in inconveniences to citizens and communities and thus, governments should give feasible solutions to cope with this potential phenomenon.
On the one hand, there are a number of factors that are grounds for vast influences on people and societies by an increasing number of old residents. For the best, this reality will pose the socio-economic burdens on states of thriving nations. This can be illustrated by the authorities, especially western rich countries have to spend a huge amount of money that obtained taxes on retirement pension and health care service. If the headache continuously happens, this will act as a precursor to consequence working adults have more tax obligations for economic hole coverage from allocating to old citizens. Hence, authorities are lacking in public funding to invest in other essential fields such as education, infrastructure, and environmental protection. Another drawback impact is that the aging population is a rationale causing the deficiency of the workforce.
On the other hand, there is an abundance of actions producing by the states in order to deal with this problem. The first option would be that governments which are facing the devastating effect of old populations, should widen the age of the employee. This measure not only reduces the number of the elderly but also save expenses distributing the social welfare that pays for these residents. Not to mention that authorities should enact policies that attract young immigrants to enlarge human resources, which means the more immigrants added, the more taxes they contribute to the national budget. Without viable laws, the phenomenon will spark off the chaos of societies leading to the crisis.
In conclusion, it is obvious that there are great consequences stemming from the rise the number of old people. To limit its negative effects, governments should bring more methods as above mentioned.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, so, thus, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1753.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28012048193 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94387149395 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593373493976 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1119724828 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.866666667 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1333333333 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.13333333333 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0823678034932 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0282465099479 0.084324248473 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458635102094 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0407252021217 0.151304729494 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0342653067867 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.