Do you agree/disagree that, in the near future, the role of teachers will be replaced by technology.
Technology or digitization has brought a positive change in our lives. It is being argued that in the longer run, instructors in our schools or colleges will be permanently substituted by technology. Though technology has made our life convenient, replacing the role of our teachers is a far-flung dream.
To begin with, teachers in educational institutions play multiple roles. They not only teach us relevant subjects but also be our guiding light in times of despair. For example, teachers in my school, apart from teaching me subjects, also played the role of a mentor by rightly guiding and motivating me to take up science as a major subject. To reciprocate this, I am forever thankful to my instructors and attribute my success to their efforts and guidance. So, this example is a strong indicator that, technology will never be able to play the role of a mentor and motivate & understand their students the way our teachers have done.
Secondly, in support of my previous argument, every single teacher possesses a different style of teaching and character which any piece of technology, no matter how sophisticated it may be, cannot accomplish. For example, my music teacher in college was flamboyant and extremely expressive. Whereas, the mathematics lecturer was a geek. On the other hand, the head coach of basketball had a military background, because of which, he was a strict disciplinarian but excellent at the game. So, every tutor/mentor followed different styles and had distinct personality traits which somewhat reflected in their teaching strategies. This example, once again, makes me a firm believer that no machine and no technology can ever achieve the unique methodologies and persona that humans bring to the table.
In conclusion, although technology seems to be transforming every rudimentary chore but it will never be able to fill the shoes of our teachers/mentors/tutors.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 293, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...as flamboyant and extremely expressive. Whereas, the mathematics lecturer was a geek. O...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, second, secondly, so, whereas, apart from, for example, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1607.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25163398693 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21958259764 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614379084967 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.339615881 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.133333333 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184832214294 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0598230547472 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625376865051 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123374573891 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425957887447 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.