Do you support that the nuclear technology should be used for constructive purposes?
Use your own knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence.
Give reasons for your viewpoint.
In the competitive reality, many people are afraid of nuclear technology and its potential to create a threat or misuse by the terrorist. However, people should be aware of Nuclear technology’s insight benefits in various methods. This essay will attempt to argue, witnessing the experience benefited by Nuclear Technology
Indeed, Nuclear Technology brings a fear not only amongst the people but also to the neighboring countries due to its efficiency. For example, when North Korea intended to set up another Nuclear plant, the citizens of the country were shaken because of the necessity of another plant. Along with them, the neighboring countries like South Korea, China, and Japan. Precisely, Japan is on a high pressure of this plan by South Korea due to their recent political aggressiveness on the dispute of World War II as Japan have caused major land destruction for North Korea during the war. While in actual, North Korea have clearly reported on the journal interviews and newspapers that the plan to set up another Nuclear plan is to generate more electricity to establish electric-vehicles by gradually cutting down the use of oil and gas in order to create pollution-free environment for their people and also to contribute to saving the environment from the serious threat of Global warming.
On the other hand, the accidents of the Nuclear Weapon are a serious warning as there is much chance of self-explosion due to the natural calamities. For instance, the Nuclear plant in Nagoya had a slight explosion during a massive earthquake in November 2011. Thus, it has caused a major loss to that area and apparently, the effect of Nuclear weapons persists.
So, in a nutshell, nuclear technology have double sharp, both advantage and disadvantages. But it is all how it is being used by someone. In my view, Nuclear technology contributes more to reduce the use of Oil and Gas which generates more Carbon-di-oxide and other harms to the environment
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 63, Rule ID: AFRAID_OF_HEIGHT[2]
Message: The noun should be probably in the plural form: 'technologies'.
Suggestion: technologies
...lity, many people are afraid of nuclear technology and its potential to create a threat or...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, however, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1664.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15170278638 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02109444821 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547987616099 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 88.143105803 49.4020404114 178% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.0 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8461538462 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07692307692 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155391882369 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0604029622052 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0307055163621 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0981454308405 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0259945979773 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.