Employers sometimes ask people apply for jobs personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree.
People have different views about requiring the personal information of candidates in job interviews. While some people believe that it brings more benefits for work conditions, I argue that we should not ask applicants about it.
On the one hand, there are some reasons why employers inquire applicants about their own personal information. Nowadays because most renowned companies such as Microsoft or Apple need their staffs to work as a team, employees must fit perfectly into their work culture. For example, these corporations often hire people who are active and communitive. If candidates only work individually in a group, it is hard to increase organization’s productivity and efficiency. Moreover, the human stability in companies is the most important, which helps them to save time and money for personnel recruitment. Therefore, a great number of organizations ask about applicants’ marriage status, they often expect that their staffs such as tellers in banks do not take time off for caring their children in first two years.
On the other hand, there are also drawbacks about asking the personal information of applicants in job interviews. Firstly, I consider that employers should concentrate on skills and job requirement which applicants must have instead of asking unrelated questions such as candidates’ hobbies or marital status, which causes a waste of time and negative effects on applicants. Consequently, employers might not recruit adequate staffs as their expectation. Secondly, there are many staffs whose personal information was stalked from their colleagues, which prevent them from doing well their tasks and also negatively affects their mind. As a result, the productivity and efficiency of organization might gradually decrease. If staffs’ personal information is not shared, they could be assured and work more efficiently.
In conclusion, while some people consider that it is beneficial for their companies when asking applicants for their interests or marital status, I strongly believe that the information about those things should be kept in confidently.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1810.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63862928349 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15604154099 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545171339564 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2718007136 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.666666667 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8666666667 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280425677606 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0982482295367 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0583411995798 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189911430023 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0146344329768 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.