Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree. Discuss both these v

Essay topics:

Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree.

Discuss both these views and give your opinion.

Nowadays, many organizations across the globe inquire prospect employee's private information. They are keen to know what their pass time activities as well as their marital status. This essay is going to explain why it is important for these companies to gather such information but ultimately it boils down to the skill set of the person rather than his/her hobbies or interests.

Large conglomerates in India ask for personal details. From academic qualifications to things like national identification number, they will not leave a stone unturned, only because they are stringent about minute details like how many marks you secured in secondary education. Their policies are designed in such a manner which it mandatory for Human resource department to gather such details. Apart from polices, they also run several background checks on the prospect employee to make sure every detail provided by the person is correct and unquestionable. This is important for them because this is how they maintain a standard across their employees. For example, many large IT companies in India ask numerous details from an employee or prospect employee to make sure that the candidate has a clean background and in no way will be unsuitable for the company. To cut the long story short such organizations believe that the devil is in the details.

On the flip side, small to medium sized organizations are not interested in personal information at all. They are more inclined towards interviewing the candidate for long hours on various questions related to the skills, technologies and experience on which the candidate seeks employment. For them information like marital status or national id, hobbies etc are of less importance. They simply not interested to know how much you scored in your tertiary/secondary education. Such companies believe in one motto: hire for talent and skills. For example: Most of the Delhi/NCR's startups and medium sized companies have hired school dropouts. They have set a trend in the market which is benefiting them manifolds.

Eventually, if an organization believes in getting the work done then the knowledge and work experience matters the most in the longer run. Being hellbent about private details does not necessarily yield the right candidate for such employers.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, so, then, well, apart from, for example, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1940.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 367.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28610354223 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93314853593 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547683923706 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 601.2 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7769540285 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.105263158 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3157894737 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.89473684211 7.06120827912 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239869047336 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757346298893 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505019540901 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143581249827 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0489139213507 0.056905535591 86% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.