Today, recruiting a qualified worker is one of the influential factor on firms’ successes. In order to choose appropriate person through job interviews, managers try to acquire candidates’ information not only about their educational qualification and vocational abilities but also about their personal life. It is believed these type of information is too much by many, although some believe it can be useful to recognize job seekers’ personalities. Both sides of this argument will be analyzed before a conclusion is reached.
In the one hand, being acquaintance to employees’ hobbies and interests provide some precious information to estimate a proper position for them. Take sport hobbies as an example. It is seemed that if an individual participate team games rather than solo sports, they will be more likely to be a good team player. As this example shows, people’s habit in spending leisure time can mirror their behavior at workplaces. Thus it would be useful to ask about these type of preferences.
On the other hand, some personal information such as marriage status is too personal to make question about and can be lead to prejudice. For instance, being divorced or single mom in some cultures doesn’t sound good and people prefer not to be asked about that. In order to respect personal private, it’s far more better let these information keep private. however, being aware about such information doesn’t have any lucrative effects.
After analyzing both sides of this debate, it is believed that questions about hobbies in work interviews make sense but there would be no rights for interviewer to ask about personal information.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 116, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to appropriate'
Suggestion: to appropriate
...rms' successes. In order to choose appropriate person through job interviews, managers...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...alyzed before a conclusion is reached. In the one hand, being acquaintance to e...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 434, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...an mirror their behavior at workplaces. Thus it would be useful to ask about these t...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ask about these type of preferences. On the other hand, some personal informa...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 327, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
...respect personal private, it's far more better let these information keep private. how...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 343, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'these informations'?
Suggestion: this information; these informations
... private, it's far more better let these information keep private. however, being aware abou...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 375, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...ter let these information keep private. however, being aware about such information doe...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n't have any lucrative effects. After analyzing both sides of this debat...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, thus, for instance, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1431.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37969924812 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09937042146 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609022556391 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9527573174 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.214285714 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271522584618 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0931363067843 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515280824052 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174127476272 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0261098073775 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.