Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful, others disagree. Discuss both the views and give your own opinion.
Nowadays the resume is the first stage of recruitment for employers to look over applicants' qualification. I believe some interests, hobbies or status may be relevant and helpful for that, but I agree most of the jobs are not necessary to inspect that.
Some spectacular jobs had better review candidates background, a criminal record or marriage status, for instance, finding financial guards, police or integrity bank clerks should examine criminal records for the public security reasons. Some experience is not easy to be learned, such as married status, thus having marriage status is better for being marriage consultants than the single.
In contrast, most of the jobs are not important to inspect interests, because these work skills can be learned through studying or teaching by senior professional, or peers. As we know, for instance, some people work in an office during daytime but partly have another part-time job as a dancer, singer, waitress at night. Employers should not set too many rules, such as marital status or personal interests or particular requirements which may be irrelevant to jobs. On the other hand, people say practice makes perfect, therefore, it proves most of the techniques in the career can be trained by experts or training assistant.
In conclusion, I prefer to agree with this information may not relevant or useful in most of work, if applicants are the lack of specific abilities, but who has a potential capability, I believe companies or corporation could train them as a suitable employee.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 82, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'applicants'' or 'applicant's'?
Suggestion: applicants'; applicant's
... recruitment for employers to look over applicants qualification. I believe some interest...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 115, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...record or marriage status, for instance, finding financial guards, police or inte...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, may, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1298.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 249.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21285140562 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86948282985 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630522088353 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 396.9 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences, or put a space between two sentences.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.929898275 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.222222222 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6666666667 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.8888888889 7.06120827912 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298804136986 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112425137934 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444492893665 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161521892885 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0567979473326 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.