The first car appeared on British roads in 1888. By the year 2000 there may be as many as 29 million vehicles on British roads. Alternative forms of transport should be encouraged and international laws introduced to control car ownership and use. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your knowledge or experience.
Modern technology has made a rapid growth in the past decade. Where we used to see fewer cars on British roads, according to researchers this count may reach up to 29 million vehicles by the year 2000. This sudden growth in the number of cars has made this problem as one of the most discussed issues of the contemporary era. The following paragraph will highlight my viewpoints on this matter.
The reason why I see eye to eye with the above statement of considering alternative medium to commute other than cars are as follows. First and foremost, the majority of cars are consuming natural resources such as petrol, diesel or CNG. Even though these resources are limited on our earth but no one wants to bother it. Secondly, no one wants to travel using public transport although its a cheaper and cost-effective way of traveling. Therefore the number of cars are increasing day by day. Even we have seen each person of a family is taking their own car to their workplaces or colleges. Which in return is increasing traffic as well as environmental pollution.
The Alternative of this if is we can replace the use of personal cars with auto-rickshaws, trains, and busses, then this can help in the reduction of pollution as well as can control the traffic issues. Finally, a point worth noting is the accidents can also decline using public transports. According to researchers, eighty percent of accidents are because of rash driving. Hence less use of personal cars bring these counts down.
In conclusion, I would like to say cars are good for personal use but not for the environment and for its resources. And it is the responsibility of every nation to take care of our planet. For this international rules could be very useful which can limit the production of cars in each nation. Similarly, encourage them to use other public transports and help in making surrounding green.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 388, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
... travel using public transport although its a cheaper and cost-effective way of tra...
^^^
Line 3, column 439, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...er and cost-effective way of traveling. Therefore the number of cars are increasing day b...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 376, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... accidents are because of rash driving. Hence less use of personal cars bring these c...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, hence, if, may, second, secondly, similarly, so, then, therefore, well, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1575.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84615384615 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80800883358 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578461538462 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.6414159761 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.8947368421 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1052631579 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232628542151 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0596721726857 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0687146962518 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128698899468 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0304248984815 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.