Foreign tourists must be charged higher fees than local people to visit the cultural places and historical sites. Do you agree or disagree with this statement. Give your own opinion including relevant examples.
The charges associated with the visits of tourist attractions are the topic of contestation for every country. Many adepts emphasize on levied the high charges on foreign tourist compared to the local visitors for visiting cultural places and historical sites. However, My inclination discord with the statement in support of the flourishment of the tourism industry in any country.
Firstly, foreigners are the tourist who visits any heritage site once in a lifetime. They are not the repetitive visitors like local people. Hence, they should be obliged by a gesture of generosity for taking interest in our culture and history. Secondly, the importance of culture will get spreading overseas from the mouth of the word through these international tourists which entitle us a unique identity on the world map. For instance, the interests of people from different countries in watching The Tajmahal, have placed India as a highly popular country to visit. Finally, by lowering the cost of the visit we can increase the flow of tourists to the city where it is located. The strategy ought to grow the several businesses associated with the place or site. For example, People visiting cultural places at Gujarat during Navaratri generating huge revenues to the vendors of traditional clothes to the foreigners.
On the other hand, local visitors are the regular users of domestic heritage places. So, more income can be produced by charging their visits. Moreover, maintenance of the cultural heritage is the responsibility of citizens because they are the people who use it frequently for their recreation. For instance, people living in Ahmedabad used to visit Akshardham as a family picnic spot. So, the cost of cleanliness and other facilities needs to be compensated with the collections borne by the residents.
To sum up, charging a different or a higher amount to international delegates can leave an impression of being unfair to the guest and it may offend them to revisit the host country which is not in favor of prestige and tourism business of the country.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1741.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16617210682 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83694113328 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560830860534 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2964588241 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.411764706 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8235294118 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.05882352941 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249559331591 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0769354125934 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513044481357 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146585772531 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0700582747516 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.