In the future, it may be scientifically possible for people to live for 150 years. This is a largely negative development with dangerous effects on our society.
Do you agree with this viewpoint?
To live a long life has been a dream for countless years. Yet if science delivers this development to humankind, it could prove to be a disaster for life on earth. This essay will argue that living a longer life is a negative development for both individuals and for society as a whole.
Those people who support the idea of living a longer life argue that there are significant advantages such as more time for a quality lifestyle and for achieving personal goals. (Argument against Jin Tao’s viewpoint) However, in my view, there are other more important issues such as poor quality of life due to ill health and limited world resources, which need to be considered.
For the individual quality of life, living for one hundred and fifty years might be more of a liability than an advantage. If people lived to an extreme age, their body organs could start to deteriorate and they may feel unhealthy for many years. They may also have to live with long periods of illness such as arthritis, which is common among older people.
From a more practical point of view, problems could occur when increasing numbers of older people begin to rely on the welfare system. We have already seen a preview of this happening in Japan, where a small number of young people have to pay more and more tax to support an increasing older population. In addition, there could be a serious decline in world resources if people lived longer. As it is, there is barely enough water for the present population of the world.
Therefore, I strongly agree with the statement that living for one hundred and fifty years would be a negative and dangerous development for both individuals and for our planet.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 201, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...eview of this happening in Japan, where a small number of young people have to pay more and more ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, therefore, in addition, such as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1402.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76870748299 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54483604112 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544217687075 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4713132477 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.846153846 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6153846154 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46153846154 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341986065504 0.244688304435 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13066466535 0.084324248473 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0854191064609 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209932805506 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0969250201689 0.056905535591 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.