Giving pocket money to children is very common in many countries. To what extend do you agree and disagree?
In many parts of the world, younsters receive money from their family members as a pocket money. Whether it is given monthly or daily basis, I believe that this practice will be fruitful in the future for these children.
To start with, first and foremost advantage of the pocket money is that children will understand the budgeting aspect from it. With a limited amount of money to spend, they will learn how they have to manage their finances from an early age. For example, if a child gets 100 rupees a day from their parents, with time he will not only start spending wisely but also may save some money from it, utilizing for the future. In contrast, if they will not provided with these finances, it is inevitable to envisage that they will be naïve in terms of their expenditure. Therefore, in future, when they will start earning, managing finances will be a facile task for them.
In addition to learning budget finances, children will also comprehend the value of money. This is paramount because of peer pressure, nowadays, children can waste money on many unwanted items. Watching friends purchasing latest video games, for example, may tempt the children to have same games. However, due to controlled money, if they refrain themselves from that period; soon they will realize that it would be a waste of money, as such games entertain just for a limited period. As a result, purchasing behavior of children will improve and they will avoid poor habits of buying useless items.
In conclusion, it is undeniably advantageous for young childrens to have pocket money, which not only improve their budgeting skills but also enhance their buying habits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 82, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'pocket money'.
Suggestion: pocket money
...eive money from their family members as a pocket money. Whether it is given monthly or daily b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 452, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'provide'
Suggestion: provide
...e future. In contrast, if they will not provided with these finances, it is inevitable t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 577, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... terms of their expenditure. Therefore, in future, when they will start earning, managing...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 25, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to budget'
Suggestion: to budget
...sk for them. In addition to learning budget finances, children will also comprehend...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 212, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'purchasing the latest'.
Suggestion: purchasing the latest
...n many unwanted items. Watching friends purchasing latest video games, for example, may tempt the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1393.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93971631206 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42299284382 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553191489362 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.5012914171 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.153846154 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6923076923 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0769230769 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12558788222 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0632473350076 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512506870456 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102504836059 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352709241303 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.