A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by a human, so they should have the same rights as a human. Others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including used for food and research. Discuss both views?
In the technological era, living conditions of people are getting better, this results in the fact that awareness of humankind towards environmental issues. In terms of this phenomenon, a kaleidoscope of people thinks that exploitation of animals should be stopped, which means that their rights which is similar to human ought to be awarded to these species. Whilst it is argued that these creatures must be made use of to meet abundant demands consisting of foodstuff as well as experimentation. From my point of view, there are reasons to be figured out regarding those two views, therefore, I am impartial on these.
On the one hand, there are a variety of resources of why people are not to be allowed to take profits of animals. Initially, these creatures are reported to have their own emotions of feelings as humankind. Hence. obligations of those should be recognized. This can be illustrated by pets, especially dogs being loyal friends of people, who are proven to have cried before leaving the house that they live in with their owner for a long period of time. Not to mention that this action can contribute to the protection of our surroundings. Image if there were no predators such as lions, leopards, and tigers in someday, the number of their prey comprehend herbivores and inferior carnivores maybe rise uncontrollably due to the wildlife would be seriously unstable. In short, the group of people supporting this perspective should be taken into consideration.
On the other hand, that a number of people hold a belief that we should maintain using animals for an abundance of purposes, should not be ignored. Specifically, these species play a pivotal role in the way we meet the method of nutrition provision along with the investigation of medical development. A typical example is that there are a large number of mice that have died in the progress of medical growth, this helps save thousands of lives. Without the plentiful resources from the animals, the international communities would be failed to thrive due to the scarcity of food and also countless patients might be died owing to there are not organs from animals for transplantation purposes.
In conclusion, it is vividly the fact that a variety of merits have been brought along the exploitation of animals, however, it can nor be denied that these creatures must experience pains or hurt as people, which is acceptable to send them the same rights. From my perspective, states should issue policies to optimize the benefits as well as restrict the drawbacks.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 208, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... own emotions of feelings as humankind. Hence. obligations of those should be recogni...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 215, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Obligations
...otions of feelings as humankind. Hence. obligations of those should be recognized. This can...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 438, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...hey live in with their owner for a long period of time. Not to mention that this action can co...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 339, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...nt. A typical example is that there are a large number of mice that have died in the progress of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, may, regarding, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, in short, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 13.1623246493 220% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 41.0 24.0651302605 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 41.998997996 167% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2129.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 424.0 315.596192385 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02122641509 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93643346756 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549528301887 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 665.1 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.4893448434 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.235294118 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9411764706 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.70588235294 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283735172682 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0821791078843 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0727776101648 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158319586403 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0400188802718 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.