Human activity has had a negative impact on plants and animals around the world. Some people think that this cannot be changed, while others believe actions can be taken to bring about a change.
Discuss both and give your opinion.
It is true that wildlife is harmfully suffered from the development activities of the human. Although it is argued that this situation is unavoidable for us, I believe that appropriate measures can be undertaken to resolve the circumstance.
Urbanisation has had an effect on surrounding trees and animals. The city developments demand a large number of spaces for building accommodations, infrastructures for growing dwellers. Hence, we have to cut down trees to make suitable spaces for the expansion of a city. For example, In Bangladesh, 50% of trees are demolished during expanding the Chittagong city. This poses a detrimental ecological imbalance, and brings the major extinction of many species of animals and plants for that area. However, we need to carry out these activities to achieve a better quality of living, and accommodate with the pace of urbanization. This means that the consequences on plants and trees are not changeable in modern life.
However, I would argue that the actions of both governments and individuals can bring improvement of the above situations. Governments should introduce regulations and urban planning to protect the plants and animals. They need to develop the city with growing plants rather than cutting them down. For Instance, the government of Norway has banned the deforestation of the country in the recent year. This could help to save the biodiversity, and ensure the survival of animals in that state. In addition, individuals can raise awareness of keeping plants and animals in the community. For example, they could conduct community seminars, rallies for saving animals and plants. Therefore, personal consciousness and the government laws can alter the way of human actions on nature.
In conclusion, while the life of plants and animals has been challenged, in my view, both the governments and citizens have a significant role to resolve this issue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ndertaken to resolve the circumstance. Urbanisation has had an effect on surrou...
^^^
Line 3, column 95, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...d animals. The city developments demand a large number of spaces for building accommodations, inf...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in my view, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1619.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34323432343 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0858279945 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557755775578 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.1108652889 49.4020404114 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.9444444444 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8333333333 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94444444444 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180764622654 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0549194075209 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0438103629683 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116641430299 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0297935041674 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.