Human activity has had a negative impact on plants and animals around the world. Some people think that this can not be changed, while others believe actions can be taken to bring about a change. Discuss both views and give your opinion
In this era of advancement, certain inventions done by humans create multiple dangers to the flora and fauna. Presently, some masses advocates that this negative trend never change whereas, others ponder that by opting various activities this has to be changed. Here, I would like to account for the both sides along with my own perception.
There are multifarious points to endorse the former viewpoint. First and foremost, newer innovations are the need of this century. To be specific, scientists invent resources to make life more comfortable that somehow impacts badly to the environment especially, plants and animals. To exemplify, with the invention of atomic bombs, no doubt the capita enhances whilst certain species became extinct or endangered. So, the human greediness does not plunge down and resulted into day by day surge in these activities without any change.
Manifold attributes can be mentioned to support the latter statement. To embark with, experiments must be conducted in those areas that are away from living species. To demonstrate, countries like India, test their bombs in the deserts that does not harm any form of life. Moreover, limitations on use of materials such as uranium, radium by the authorities that impacts negatively on the life's of living ones. Consequently, this helps to vanish the problem.
To recapitulate, both sides viewed simultaneously but I strongly agree that the latter concept has more weightage as compared to former. As, local government and people take certain proactive steps like limited use of dreadful chemicals and awareness in order to preserve the species for the future generations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 371, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., radium by the authorities that impacts negatively on the lifes of living ones. ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, moreover, so, whereas, as to, no doubt, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1401.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36781609195 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83670357223 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.674329501916 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.978311962 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.4 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.13333333333 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203628405035 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0547238609526 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542507109849 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107343377288 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0465860376754 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.57 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.11 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.