Individuals should not be allowed to carry guns as it increases crime and violence in society. To what extent do you agree or disagree, give your own opinion?
It is believed that letting people own handguns make offenders and savagery in the community are on the rise. It seems to me that, this statement is highly precise and therefore I agree with it.
On the one hand, it cannot be denied the fact that permission residents to use pistols sometimes brings a number of advantages. In particular, in an abundance of nations which consider gun-owner is legal. As a result, they can use this type of weapon for self-defend purposes as well as recreational demands such as bird hunting, shooting sport. This can be demonstrated by America, a multiracial nation with a vast area, where the government allows its citizens to possess short-gun. Thanks to the policy, people can defend themselves when they are attacked by wild animals or terrorists. Enterprises produce guns, as a result of the lawful rule, would thrive and in turn, contribute to society’s well-being through the tax system. The more products they sell, the more tax they have to pay to assist the Authority with such fields as environmental protection, health-care, transportation.
On the other hand, apart from the concerns expressed above, I perceive that it is almost impossible to have a tranquil society for a nation to prosper with the legalization of the possession of pistols. Firstly, a number of criminals regarding the use of guns would be climbing, if the state does not impose a restriction on all kinds of weapons including handguns. In consequences of such law does not only cause an increase in the rate of serious lawbreakers but also make greatly pressure on executives bodies such as police, security, and residents. Subsequently, the rise numbers of government officials make up a heavy burden to the Authority and decrease the investment of the state in improving the standard of the education system.
In conclusion, as far as I am concerned, the demerits of the possession guns are obviously and thus, I support those who do not agree with this policy.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, regarding, so, therefore, thus, well, apart from, in conclusion, in particular, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1662.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02114803625 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01756585213 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589123867069 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6126999266 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.714285714 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6428571429 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5714285714 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0910505974837 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0305801670253 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0294872994555 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0595203431007 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.018777083532 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.