International tourism has brought enormous benefit to many places. At the same time, there is concern about its impact on local inhabitants and the environment. Do the disadvantages of international tourism outweigh the advantages?
In recent epoch, people have been showing more interest in traveling to foreign places. due to this phenomenon, the indigenous culture and habitat seem to be in danger. However, In my opinion, the merits of international tourism far weigh its demerits.
To begin with, the benefits of international tourism are many. The foremost advantage is it broadens the scope of employment for the local people. In other words, the travel, hospitality, and transport sectors are benefitted enormously. Consequently, it prospers the economy of the host country by fostering business and employment. For instance, countries like Egypt and Thailand are entirely dependent on international tourism.
Another reason to quote international tourism to be beneficial is it helps the people to understand and admire other countries cultures and traditions. Admittedly, it bonds people of various ethnic backgrounds to come closer and live in diversity. As a result, the person becomes more tolerant of the diversified way of living, which indeed is a step towards the world's peace and harmony.
On the other hand, it can be well argued that local culture is affected due to international tourists coming to the country. The local people tend to lose their originality in order to serve foreign clients. For example, they change their ethnic dishes to maintain the taste as per foreign customers. Therefore, sometimes such things can gradually have a devastating effect on the local way of living.
In conclusion, I pen down saying that although international tourism has a small impact on culture; at the same time, it has ample of benefits. The culture can be preserved with little efforts of local people and it does not require to ban the international tourists exploring the country, which boosts the countries economy and binds the people to live in a diversified culture. Hence, without qualms, the advantages of international tourism outweigh its disadvantages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 89, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Due
...nterest in traveling to foreign places. due to this phenomenon, the indigenous cult...
^^^
Line 5, column 364, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...ing, which indeed is a step towards the worlds peace and harmony. On the other hand...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 234, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'banning'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: banning
...of local people and it does not require to ban the international tourists exploring th...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 308, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...exploring the country, which boosts the countries economy and binds the people to live in...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, hence, however, if, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, in other words, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1652.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34627831715 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0157089509 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569579288026 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.8879761798 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7777777778 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1666666667 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.61111111111 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277385522408 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0881409084172 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0951974724583 0.0667982634062 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149838139477 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0863958866793 0.056905535591 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.