International tourism has brought enormous benefits to many places. At the same time, there is concern about its impact on local inhabitants and the environment.
Do the disadvantages of international tourism outweigh the advantages?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
It is evident that globalization has made it possible to travel across the world conveniently and comfortably which encourages people to explore and visit the novel destinations. In my opinion, I believe that this trend proved negative for the local communities as well as the environment inspite of the advantage of this to the economy of a nation.
Admittedly, travel industry plays a vital role in the growth of the country's economy. Some countries such as Thailand, Singapore and Malaysia largely depends on the tourism sector because it contributes around 30% of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Millions of people across the world visit these tourist spots annually, and they spend a lot of money to buy tickets, stay in hotels and shopping in the local popular markets which ultimately lead to the inflow of international capital to the local entrepreneurship & employment generation. This is also associated with international investments and infrastructure development.
Despite this, it has influenced the lives of regional dwellers and the biosphere reserves of the place badly. The natural ecosystem of the place gets disturbed when more and more people interfere in it. To illustrate it with an example, recently Kedarnath in India was heavily flooded due to the deforestation caused by builders and governments to construct hotels ad roads in hilly areas, and there was approximate loss of 5000 lives. Apart from this, indigenous society has to suffer a lot due to the scarcity of available resources for them. Shimla, for instance, in northern India faces shortage of water for local inhabitants as most of the water is being used by hotels and restaurants.
In conclusion, inspite of the fact that the financial position of the country's economy gets strengthened with the tourism sector, but it has detrimental effects on the local lives and ecosystem.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, then, well, apart from, as to, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1582.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27333333333 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03218352513 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.8912395633 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.833333333 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.08333333333 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126208250012 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0390898312189 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0302050067105 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0697411388162 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0164410541917 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.