is it better for children to learn to read by using online material or by using printed material?discuss and give your opinion.

Essay topics:

is it better for children to learn to read by using online material or by using printed material?
discuss and give your opinion.

Improving technology brings with it myriad changes in all aspects of modern life. A recently debated topic is that whether it is better for students to converge to technology and use online sources or keep their way and use books. Both sides of this debate will be analyzed before a conclusion is reached.
In one camp, it is seemed that using internet for learning brings about number of merits. Not only is environmentally friendly by leading to decline in using papers, but also is much more friendly user. Since it provides an option of accessing to admired information by searching a word. Furthermore, in retrospect, it is assumed that converging to technology is inevitable. For example, at the early-emerging stage of cellphones, many refused to employ that technology. But, now almost all members of society use it and imagine life without cell phones is definitely hard. Thus, it is obvious that students will be more benefited if keep pace with technology.
However, this trend as be expected has some limitations. Take china as an example. Many sites are banned due to the government’s politics and caused limitations to access information. In addition to this, it should take speed of internet for downloading information and even poor accessibility to internet network in many parts of the world, into an account. However, printing sources do not have these restrictions and can be used whenever and wherever a student wish.
Following this debate, I believe learning children how to use online sources is a way that societies have to path, and for some developing countries developing infrastructures is a first step. It is hoped all students will be able to employ online sources in the near future.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 204, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...s, but also is much more friendly user. Since it provides an option of accessing to a...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, thus, for example, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalization wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1445.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08802816901 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0124798282 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591549295775 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2824921161 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.0 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7058823529 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.58823529412 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191691089821 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0526876619124 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0698893609842 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120947119417 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0364454455077 0.056905535591 64% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.