It is inevitable that as technology advances, traditional cultures will be lost. It seems that we cannot have these two things together.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Technology is rapidly growing in popularity. Some culturologists think that it can be fatal to culture., but some technophiles are opposed to them and say that they are coexisting without problems these days. In this essay, I agree that they both can live in harmony.
Let us start with the reasons why some cultural scientists claim that technology can completely destroy culture. The first reason is associated with the substantial shift in attention from cultural development to technology. For example, the majority of young spend much time on video games and Internet surfing on their smartphones, which they had better devote to learning about their national customs and traditions. Another reason is related to globalisation promoted through technology. In light of technological growth, cultural unification is spreading faster and therefore displacing culture in communities. Consequently, after the analysis of these arguments, it is clear that owning to technology, culture might eventually become obsolete and get out of use.
Nevertheless, some technology supporters argue that culture and technology can go together well. They justify their point of view with the following reasoning. Firstly, technology makes cultural education more interesting. For instance, there are many cultural documentaries available on the Youtube, which present tradition animated. As a result, a growing number of children are willing to learn more about their nations and national features with interest and in mother tongue. Secondly, technology hardly interconnects with traditions. Since there are few overlaps between these two aspects of life, they cannot negatively affect each other. Thereby, after the consideration of these argumentations, it is evident that contemporary advancements in technology can be in peace with culture in the modern world.
In conclusions, even though some culturologists believe that technology might have a detrimental impact on culture, I think that they can get along and even successfully complement one another.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1751.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74098360656 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14556632047 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606557377049 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.5775604321 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2777777778 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9444444444 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.55555555556 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188146915955 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0594826248247 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0429718083057 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102982579582 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0590733749502 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.