It is more important for a building to serve a purpose than to look beautiful. Architects should not worry about producing building as a work of art.
Architecting a building design and its construction process is a challenging task. There are several factors need to be taken into consideration for a good establishment. It is asserted by some people that most prominent determinant for a building is to serve a purpose, rather than to look beautiful so architects should focus more on functional aspects instead of their outside appearance. I completely agree with this notion and intend to discuss my views in subsequent paragraphs.
On the one hand, one school of thought believes that great outlook of a building bring name and fame to an organization. In fact, in this competitive world where everyone strives to work hard for recognition, such implementations not only bring unique identification but also promote a brand worldwide. For instance, Burj Khalifa is world`s tallest building renowned for its design which brought international fame for Dubai as well as boosted their tourism industry. However, this does not true in most of the cases. In contrast, if a building fails to fulfill its basic agenda then it may have devastating impacts. For instance, a recent report after earth quake in Japan states that most of the constructions collapsed during earth quake were those which had not been designed considering their robustness and durability.
On the other hand, I endorse the concept of architecture of the building should be based on the functional approach, not looks. The prominent reason is that if the building structure is not as per the comfort requirements of people then it would not be productive. To illustrate an example, a popular building of Infosys, a well-known multinational company, in Singapore was brilliant in design, a curvy and unique design, but still not fully operational because of the space and ventilation issue which was a huge wastage of money. In addition to it, establishing adequate safety measures, another crucial element required to fulfill main purpose, are much more important than outlooks as nothing can be compared with a human`s life. Thus, such buildings which satisfy essential criteria are more effective and efficient than stunning outlooks.
In conclusion, although beautiful design may help an organization to be popular and famous, yet a creation which suffices basic criteria such as durability, ruggedness and safety, is much more important in terms of safety, productivity and tackle natural disasters. Hence, designer and builders focus more on achieving purpose of the building instead of creating a useless antique piece of art.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, look, may, so, still, then, thus, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, in fact, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2167.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 406.0 315.596192385 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33743842365 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06759432161 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 176.041082164 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581280788177 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 675.9 506.74238477 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.2873383643 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.470588235 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8823529412 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1764705882 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293162681711 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0861143163959 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0685806933823 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172096043106 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0475287435724 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.