It is often thought that the increase in juvenile crime can be attributed to violence in the media. What do you think is the reason for the growth in the rate of juvenile crime? What solutions can you offer to deal with the situation?
It is irrefutable that there has been a growth in the juvenile crime rate in the recent days. Though some people may argue that it has been contributed by the violence in media, I believe that it is contributed by the change in the entire lifestyle of the society. This essay will discuss two paramount arguments supporting this view and probable ways to handle the situation.
First and foremost, in the last few decades the entire family structure has undergone a drastic change. For instance, because of the financial necessities, both the parents are required to work and hence, they spend a very less time with their adolescent children. This leaves them without proper guidance and when they make wrong decisions, there is no one to mentor them. Furthermore, we cannot deny that, there is more exposure to youngsters nowadays. This is caused by the advancement in technology that can bring the whole world to our desk. But, the downside of this is that, sometimes, juveniles are not aware of what is moral and what is not.
These problems can be overcome only by the combined effort of the parents and the teachers. For example, parents should spend more time with their children and guide them in how their difficult situations should be handled. Additionally, proper counselling should be provided by the mentors at school to youngsters, who go astray and also, though we cannot shun youth from enjoying the benefits of technology, we should teach them assess the morality of what is presented to them.
In a nutshell, our transformed way of life along with the unguided exposure to undesirable contents is the major contributor to the increase in juvenile crime-rate and this can be solved through prompt direction from the elders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, may, so, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1465.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68648165072 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58361774744 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4219554626 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.692307692 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5384615385 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.84615384615 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211345686958 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0696768331236 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0719679225767 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125821983385 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0400351831908 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.