From the last ten years, the numbers of social issues are directly or indirectly caused by youngsters. While some feel that these issues are occurring because parents are not their proper time to their children, I, however, believe that there are other factors as well that are contributing to increase in serious issues.
Firstly, the attitude of youngsters is the reason which engages them in bad activities. They sometimes want to earn money at their early stage of life. Owing to this, many times they choose wrong paths due to their vulnerable mind. For example, Russia is the country, where children usually do shoplifting for pocket money.
Another reason is the early access of internet to youngsters. Due to many social media sites, children get influenced by the terrorists or other criminals which motivates youngsters to work for them. Let us take Syria as an example, where most of the terrorists are in the 12 to 18 age group, who get hired through Facebook. Moreover, children sometimes watch violence movies on the internet which do brainwash them. Consequently, children might do violence activities such as fighting with friends.
However, despite the arguments above, I do concede that parents are more inclined towards their jobs due to which they are not able to give sufficient time for their kids. In this competitive words, parents are working round the clock in their offices for the betterment of their children, so they are getting less or no time to nurture their children. A good illustration of this is IT companies, where parents often bring their work to home due to work overload, which keeps them away from their children even at home.
In conclusion, I believe that intention to earn money at an early stage and the internet are the core reasons which are indulging youngsters in more social problems. Also, parents are giving less time to their children due to overwork.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ibuting to increase in serious issues. Firstly, the attitude of youngsters is t...
^^^
Line 3, column 191, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to wrong'
Suggestion: to wrong
.... Owing to this, many times they choose wrong paths due to their vulnerable mind. For...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 501, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tivities such as fighting with friends. However, despite the arguments above, I ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1602.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02194357367 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56612895933 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539184952978 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3200126136 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.125 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9375 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166941881711 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0573670683536 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518541816091 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101273791629 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0472095499967 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.