The main purpose of public libraries is to provide books and they shouldn’t waste their limited resources and space on providing expensive hi-tech media such as computer software, videos and DVDs. To what extend do you agree or disagree with the statement.
It is believed that this decade is dedicated to technological advancements where computers are so compact as well as affordable, even softwares are becoming a viable option to purchase for any specific purpose. In this case, I support the notion that having rich media resources is inevitable for libraries as it is less spacious and inexpensive. Nowadays, libraries are well equipped with all the hi-tech media facilities which not only provides latest digital contents but also provides softwares where one can easily navigate through references, plus one can also find the exact meaning of relative vocabularies.
Hi-tech media does not occupy more space, and also becomes the cheaper option to avail digital devices and relative softwares. These hardware-software combination is giving a whole new experience to the users in terms of availing latest updates on a particular topic. Additionally, many of the professional fields in today’s time require an immediate update, so via DVDs, it is achievable to maintain cutting edge knowledge. For example, many lang libraries are encouraging their member to go for this new option as they would get something extra. Five computers in a single row are occupying as much space as five reading tables, so space could not be the issue. Additionally, these libraries almost buying refurbish products so cost is also not an issue.
Another benefit of availing hi-tech resources at libraries is the members can find out what that need easily without hovering through each section. The topic, members are keen about can navigate easily with their references as well as they also know the meaning of some field related terminology using built-in dictionary.
So, if all these material could be accommodated in one single computer or DVD then space should not be the issues for libraries. For example, one of the municipality libraries in my city has replaced many books with DVDs. These DVDs are properly labeled so that it is easy for the user to find reference DVDs. They also removed one complete rack of science section to avail space for setup of the computers and DVD.
To conclude, many benefits of providing digital media clearly outweighs the space and limited resources issues. Particularly today’s digital options are so small and less costly that any library would give a thought on having these facilities on premises.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 439, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'provides the latest'.
Suggestion: provides the latest
...hi-tech media facilities which not only provides latest digital contents but also provides soft...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 222, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'availing the latest'.
Suggestion: availing the latest
...new experience to the users in terms of availing latest updates on a particular topic. Addition...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, well, even so, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2008.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 384.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22916666667 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83106814323 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544270833333 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 653.4 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.2572473398 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.866666667 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206879889891 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0715189485562 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0471860580083 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121648604619 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0129216289481 0.056905535591 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.