Many childhood diseases can now be prevented through the use of vaccines.
Should parents be made by law to immunise their children against common diseases or should individuals have the right to choose not to immunise their children?
In this era, immunization is the only key to prevent offspring’s from life- threating diseases. Some masses advocates that parents must be legally forced to get their child vaccination whereas, others ponder that it would be the personal decision of every parent. I favour the former statement as authorities plays phenomenal role by take steps to prevent new buds from illness because parents understand the value of these steps later on . This essay reflect light on both sides along with reasoned conclusion.
There are manifold attributes that can endorse the former view. Firstly, legally parents became aware about the health status of their kids and provide them vaccination on time. To be specific, childhood vaccination should be done according to particular age group so they can be effective against the diseases. To illustrate, in India, government make a road to health cards in which injections to children done and noted and if someone find not following the rule then they should be answerable and charged penalties for it. Moreover, some parents are illiterate so not know necessity of these vaccinations. To exemplify, polio, anthrax is not known by people but still it is deadly disease. However, with the government efforts the life of children becomes more blessed. This helps to improve the overall health of the future generation.
On contrary to this, multifarious points support the latter view. To embark with, the superstitions of certain group of parents do not allow them to choose medical facilities . To demonstrate, in some communities, it is in their religious belief that they do not take medicine at all even though, they are seriously ill. Consequently, they opt a choice of not treating their kids with medical supplies.
To recapitulate, both points holds its own significance, undeniably, the merits of former overweight the latter. So, I strongly opine that when legal rules are inculcated and they should be abide by everyone so that the new ones not suffered from diseases and this leads to healthy nation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 114, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'advocate'.
Suggestion: advocate
...m life- threating diseases. Some masses advocates that parents must be legally forced to ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 230, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... whereas, others ponder that it would be the personal decision of every parent. I...
^^
Line 1, column 340, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... as authorities plays phenomenal role by take steps to prevent new buds from illn...
^^
Line 1, column 446, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...rstand the value of these steps later on . This essay reflect light on both sides ...
^^
Line 3, column 439, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'finds'.
Suggestion: finds
... children done and noted and if someone find not following the rule then they should...
^^^^
Line 5, column 175, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... allow them to choose medical facilities . To demonstrate, in some communities, it...
^^
Line 7, column 191, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'abided', 'abode'?
Suggestion: abided; abode
...rules are inculcated and they should be abide by everyone so that the new ones not su...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, still, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1731.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21385542169 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84235829572 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60843373494 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5177520425 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.1666666667 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4444444444 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217795872816 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0536039460844 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579105796833 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116449958724 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525964468597 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.