The number of people living in urban cities has become more in recent times all around the world. Majority of people state that social bonds in many societies has become weaker due to overcrowding in metropolitan cities. This essay will examine this phenomenon and suggest some measures.
First of all, it is obvious that corruption will be primary result of community sense loss. If people have become more individual benefit oriented, income taxes will be used for authorities own needs. There will be strong control mechanism when individuals have good communication and understanding in socities. For example, a study by World Money Bank in 2018 revealed that corruption is a major phenomenons in many progressing countries. It is reported that 80% income tax in Man was used to purchase many automobiles which are cutting edge of computer technology and many detached houses which are too affluent to local authorities since there are not any social groups available to monitor such expenses.
Secondly, countless measures can be taken to address this phenomenon. One of the primary measures can be that local goverments can persuade citizens to organise social meetings within each skyscrapers. Celebrating national holidays all together will enable neighbours have strong bonds. When they share similar feelings and thoughts, they will gather and behave togerther Further and more importantly, goverments should introduce laws to make engineers design horizontally alligned building rather than tall structures. If the number of apartment blocks increases, there will be fewer people living in buildings hense interaction between them will rise dramatically. For instance, a report by Mani goverment in 2018 reported that 80% of people living in condos have close relationship with neighbours while 90% of people living in skyscrapers donot event know names of them.
By way of conclusion, the number of city dwellers has risen exponentially in recent times and thus community sense has become weaker which increased corruption rate in many countries, but officals can take many steps to reverse it. I would contend that seminars should be prsented yearly to make people aware of this problem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 398, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'phenomenon'?
Suggestion: phenomenon
...018 revealed that corruption is a major phenomenons in many progressing countries. It is re...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1865.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40579710145 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79777869702 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602898550725 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 584.1 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.2646666114 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.5625 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5625 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176493456366 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.064914708254 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0568876008034 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111968440789 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0246695684927 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.