In many countries it is now illegal to smoke in public places. It is only fair that people who wish to smoke should have to leave the building.
Do you agree or disagree?
Smoking is hazardous to health. There are many primitive measures are being taken in different countries, one among them is smoking is prohibited in public areas. I agree to a concept to oblique smokers to walk to a designated area to smoke. Consequently, passive smoker is out from health risk.
Indirect cigarette smoking people are always being a victim from tobacco smokers. Government from many countries has banned smoking in public places giving a safe and healthy environment to all. Indeed, it is inevitable to curb tobacco smokers immediately. However, they are offered a designated smoking area. It is worth noting, software companies like Google, Microsoft in the USA have offered a vacuum room out from the work facility for Tobacco or E-Cigarette smokers to use for smoking. In other words, a person who wants to smoke, has to leave the workspace to smoking area keeping away inconvenience caused by them to others. Likewise, if they are on visit to Public Mall or Cinema theatre, they should use allotted smoking booth for smoking. As a result of this initiative by local government in many nations, it has reduced down the count of passive smokers, the people who does not smoke but getting impacted by the real smokers.
Additionally, Singapore, as an example, has gradually reduced number of smoking booth in public area and imposed a huge fine and conviction to a person breaching the rule. Thus, people find it difficult and subsequently quit smoking.
In summary, I agree to the new initiative to make the people who wants to smoke to leave public place or a building out for smoke. And also, restricting them to smoke in public area causing health hazard to others. As a result, people may gradually tend to quit the habit of smoking.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, likewise, may, so, thus, as to, in summary, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1471.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95286195286 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69764847677 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525252525253 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.1021859042 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.5294117647 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4705882353 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41176470588 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333754258987 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111874871317 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0873711028297 0.0667982634062 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209557962076 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0843056396289 0.056905535591 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 9.78957915832 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.