Banning plastic bags as an approach to prevent environmental degradation and pollution is a controversial issue. I completely agree with this issue because plastic bags have harmful effects on humans and animals and banning the use of them would be perfectly beneficial. This essay is going to support this idea in details and give some more specific examples.
One of the most important pros of banning plastic bags could be reducing litter and pollution and saving priceless nonrenewable resources. Plastic bags are manufactured using petroleum as a nonrenewable resource which can be used for many other important productions instead. Nonrenewable resources are priceless and it is not worth to use them to produce plastic bags just for carrying goods. In addition, these types of bags often contain polyethylene and cannot biodegrade. It means that if they are not recycled or disposed of properly, they become pollution like commonly see alongside the roads or floating in the water. Thus, putting a halt to plastic bags not only decline plastic pollution and litter but also save the valuable resources for more beneficial products.
Furthermore, other advantages of banning plastic bag could be referring to wildlife and money wasting. These plastic bags litter are often mistaken for food by animals such as marine or birds. This endangered animals by choking, poisoning or entanglement which can result in death. In addition, another possible negative point of using plastic bags could be that millions of dollars are spent each year in litter clean-up costs which could spend in more efficient purposes such as education improvements issues or poverty eradication plans. Hence, forbidding the plastic bags use can reduce its harmful effects on wildlife and human beings.
To conclude, reducing the litter and plastic pollution and impact on wildlife could be some of the benefits of banning the plastic bags. I completely agree that countries and governments put a halt to plastic ban use in order to prevent environmental pollution and protect wildlife plus bringing economic benefits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 88, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...llution and impact on wildlife could be some of the benefits of banning the plastic bags. I...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, so, thus, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1779.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3746223565 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81598873145 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525679758308 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 553.5 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1912534548 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.1875 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6875 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0625 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217597850962 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0833617393225 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0322659280674 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149546991224 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.025757961506 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.