In many countries plastic bags are the main source of rubbish causing pollution in oceans and on land; therefore they should be banned. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
In some countries banning plastic bags is a policy in order to prevent environmental degradation and pollution. I partially agree with prohibiting plastic bag due to the fact that plastics have enormous harmful effects on humans' and animals' life, whereas, it might be other ways rather than prohibiting. This essay is going to mention some of the banning advantages and suggests other solutions.
One of the most important reasons that make the banning plastic bags an efficient policy could be that it leads to reduce negative impacts on wildlife and environment. Plastic bags often contain polyethylene and cannot biodegrade. It means that if they are not recycled or disposed of properly, they become permanent pollution like commonly see alongside the roads or floating in the water. In addition, plastic bags endangered animals because they are often mistaken for food by animals such as marine or birds so it might cause choking or poisoning which can result in death. Thus, putting a halt to plastic bags not only decline plastic pollution and litter but also protect wildlife.
However, there are several solutions instead of banning which could be more efficient. One possible solution could be changing in consumers' behavior. Most of the time people often use their plastic shopping bags just for one time and then threw it away. This wrong behavior wastes extremely much amount of energy and money. It is obvious that if people were asked to assist collaboratively in recycling process not only the environmental pollution plunged but the convenient use of these bags will continue.
To conclude, reducing the litter and plastic pollution and impact on wildlife could be some of the benefits of banning the plastic bags. I completely agree that countries and governments put a halt to plastic ban in order to prevent environmental pollution and protect wildlife plus prevent some unnecessary expenditure.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 336, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ibiting. This essay is going to mention some of the banning advantages and suggests other s...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 88, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...llution and impact on wildlife could be some of the benefits of banning the plastic bags. I...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, thus, whereas, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1619.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25649350649 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76062438092 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558441558442 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5458435905 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.933333333 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5333333333 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21718243481 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0755507439015 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0332776737293 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137725464255 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330789918131 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.