Many countries spend a lot of money on art. Some people think investment in art is necessary, but others say money is better spent on public services and facilities. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
When the government spends money on something, they have to aware of the most benefits for their citizens. In reality, it is quite difficult to improve a thing that everyone agrees with including art and public services. A lot of people would like to invest in art due to culture and education, while others think that there is another thing that is more important as public services. This set of materials will consider both viewpoints.
Investment in art gives our children a number of advantages. One of them is that it helps children learn the history of the country and create new ideas. It means that some artworks contain history content describing a necessary event in history, or they have styles that can create inspiration for children. Vincent Van Gogh portrait, for example, is the picture of a famous artist in the past, and his artworks are extremely unique that every artist has to learn. Another reason is that these art styles are legacies from ancestors. If we do not care about them and teach children in a new generation, these works will be forgotten and disappear in the future. Therefore, the government should be more interested in art and maintain them for our descendants.
However, art is not only one thing that we should focus on. There are public services which are important for everyone, both the poor and the rich, in the country. Public services – such as bus, train, and so on – help many people to have a better quality of life because plenty of people do not have their own cars, so they have to rely on these services. If the services are poor or not good enough, many people will get an effect. They may go to work late; as a result, they have a problem with their managers. Besides public transports, public services can include water, library, and restroom. Thus, there is a lot of stuff having to improve for people in society.
In conclusion, not only is art important for learning and culture, but public services also are crucial for improving life’s qualities of people in society. In my opinion, the government should concentrate on both of them, but they should improve public services first because they affect all people in the country and invest in art later on.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, while, another thing, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1855.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 387.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79328165375 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51128760681 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490956072351 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 574.2 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5665869675 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.75 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.35 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2718073997 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0792117714987 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574894837683 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172421349336 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0531074672134 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.