In some countries, it is unquestionable topic for public to welcome worldwide sporting matches to hold in their homeland. The other trends demonstrate the isusse could be have a long-term and unnecessary problems. I am unsure whether those would be pros or cons so I will analyse both sides and share my opinion.
The significant disadvantage is the tremendous budget speding on competition, especially for infrastructure, would hardly bring useful benefit to the nations. The main reason to build new stadiums and upgrade underground transportion is servicing the competitions itself without covering the public needs and requests. For instance, Tokyo olympic association with gorvernment had made decision to move the well-know sea products market to other rural area after the city won the opportunity to hold the game, causing not only inconvenience lifestyle but also the local culture losses. It is a profound argument today no matter nations or tourists. Futhermore, Soon be useless buildings are one of the major discussions before match starts but relatively find valuable solution after it held. Another worthy consideration point is that it is a method to avoid economy recession so attract traveller come would be increase the local tourism industry, becoming an archaic function nowadays.
It is ture to have positive side to spend some financial plan on this so a less famous city can have unbelievable opportunity win it deserved. For example, Barcelona is a city with low attraction before olympic was held in 1992, the profits from this international sporting fair is affecting all the people who like or not trip, resulting the top 10 must-to city definitely include the name of the city.
In conclusion, to hold a world-class competition such as sporting is not a worse idea but if the country can spend the money to solve local problem that would be more profitable for the public.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1603.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20454545455 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98184724125 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.662337662338 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.2745454843 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.583333333 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6666666667 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168346365186 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0554177684561 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499659665125 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101611553187 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0467624601687 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.95 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.