Many offenders commit more crimes after serving the first punishment. Why is this happening, and what measures can be taken to tackle this problem?
Crime became a severe social issue in many countries. It has been suggested that there has been an unprecedented incline in people who re-offend and getting back to prison after their first sentence. In my opinion, understanding the probable reasons for this phenomenon is important and may lead us to some applicable solutions that will result in reducing people getting back to prison.
One of the most prominent factors that lead people to re-offend is lack of rehabilitation. First-time criminals are not given proper rehabilitation and guidance to live good in society. As they are surrounded by other criminals, the knowledge and the acquaintance they gain in prison are often criminals, so they are not given a chance to earn good thought. Another point worth considering is the conduct of the person. After releasing from jail, they are often unemployed due to the sentence they spent in jail. So they find some tough times to earn enough money to sustain. As a result, they will make some crime regardless of the consequences.
There are some effective solutions to eradicate these issues. One way to tackle the problem is to make sure that all the criminals entering into the prison are given proper guidance to change themselves by providing rehabilitation process. By this, they will have good thoughts and find a better way to live. Another way to shun the problem of criminals is to train them in their specific skills. Every person has a skill, prisons should be capable of identifying those key skills and train them so that they can stand on their feet after releasing, and as a result, they are less likely to do the crime as they will be self-employed. These solutions will hopefully prevent them to commit more crimes.
In conclusion, having rehabilitation sessions and improvising the skills of the criminal in jail are the two best solutions to restrict this phenomenon. If the governments implement these problems the crime rate will surely decrease
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 154, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... solutions to restrict this phenomenon. If the governments implement these problem...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, so, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1659.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04255319149 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84019743726 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528875379939 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4053911367 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.1666666667 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2777777778 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.38888888889 7.06120827912 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152932288218 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0459400039905 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0310930845999 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0975572663754 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357512697 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.