Many office authorities impose a restriction on smoking within the office premises. Some governments have even banned smoking in all public places. This is a good idea but it takes away some of our freedom.
What are your opinions on this?
Passive smokers are highly impacted by cigarette smokers. Therefore, it is strictly prohibited to light a cigarette in the office and also it is banned to smoke in public areas. Undeniably, it is a great idea to have a fresh environment. However, addicts think that they lose their liberty.
It is a never-ending debate about smokers' freedom. Because, in the recent news, an employee from a reputed Information technology company has filed a case against the company that the person is affected by a passive-cancer due to the smoking area allocated near to the Vehicle parking space. Having said that, Software engineers sometimes tend to smoke a lot in the name of short refreshment. However, the allocated dungeon place generates heavy smoke, even a non-smoker can feel twenty cigars smoking effect.
For chain smokers, it is sometimes slightly difficult to stay controlled for a long time. Nonetheless, it should not harm the people who are not involved in the harmful habit. Instead, the Government should allocate some Geo-Friendly space like a smoking booth or similar to the one in the International Airports offering the smokers to use the vacuum segments without disturbing others. By doing this, nobody can feel handcuffed. On the other hand, the Government also owns the responsibilities of the public and the environment, to gradually decrease the count of Cancer patients who is majorly affected by using Tobacco in various form.
In my opinion, despite, spending money to spare the space in the public areas, they should generate a health awareness on the effect of smoking.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, nonetheless, so, therefore, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1345.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19305019305 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91186252542 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.625482625483 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.2844243661 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0714285714 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64285714286 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186393804916 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0535215091719 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488914568332 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0959353586716 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335571908818 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.