Many people believe the government should spend money on faster public transport. Others think that money should be spent on different aspects of public transportation, such as cost reduction and environmental conservation. Discuss both views and give your own opinion
Maintaining transport is an imperative element in government purview. While some cite that it is necessary to spend money on faster public transportation and others say that it should spend on other features like conserving the environment and reducing the cost of transportation. In this essay, I will discuss both sides of the spectrum and draw my opinion.
On one hand, there are some people believe that it is an irrefutable fact that a country needs a public transport which is fast, as it accelerates the economy of the country. Many people prefer metros than conventional buses which might be stuck in congestions, as a result, they could be able to reach their work locations and spend some quality and quantity time with family. If the transport is slow then commuters might not reach offices in time and could be penalized. This could be seen in increasing number of people preferring tube in Bangalore than government buses. So government spending money on the faster mode of transport is significant.
On the other hand, a comparative number of people say that instead of squandering public taxes on faster transport, they could spend it on other elements of transportation. There is a massive development in recent years and many urban places are expanding rapidly in the name of development which includes roads and transport. Government is cutting down the trees and building roads which is a negative impact on the environment, instead, they can spend on constructing flyovers and eco-friendly roads which is not hazardous to nature. With the advancement of new technology, the latest vehicles will give a greater mileage which is cost-effective. Authorities could invest some amount on these technologies which could be less costly.
In conclusion, this essay discussed why some people think that the government needs to spend tax money on faster transportation and why other people say that need to spend on other aspects of transportation. According to my perspective, faster transportation is necessary, but we need to think about cost and environment, there is no good in it? If we are fast with a lot of pollution and high price.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then, while, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1807.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10451977401 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07129707379 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494350282486 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.3411892007 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.9375 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4375 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.363163935186 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112614666315 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0942457334812 0.0667982634062 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231859106559 0.151304729494 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0605740699097 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.