Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are the reasons for this? What can be done to change this negative attitude towards international tourism?
In recent epoch, people have been showing more interest in traveling to foreign places. due to this phenomenon, the indigenous culture and habitat seem to be in danger. However, In my opinion, the merits of international tourism far weigh its demerits.
To begin with, the benefits of international tourism are many. The foremost advantage is it broadens the scope of employment for the local people. In other words, the travel, hospitality, and transport sectors are benefitted enormously. Consequently, it prospers the economy of the host country by fostering business and employment. For instance, the prosperity of countries like Dubai, Egypt, and Thailand is a manifestation of welcoming tourists from different countries.
Another reason that quotes international tourism to be beneficial is it helps the people to understand and admire other countries cultures and traditions. Admittedly, it develops an amicable relationship among the people of various ethnic backgrounds. As a result, foreign visits make people more tolerant of the diversified way of living, which indeed is a step towards global peace and harmony.
On the other hand, it can be well argued that local culture is affected due to cross border tourists activities. The tourist spoils the environment to make their itinerary. For example, water sports in Thailand to entertain the tourists disturbs the sea life and causes environmental pollution. Sometimes, the travelers are seen dumping waste anywhere spoiling the scenic beauty of the place. Moreover, the tourists' interaction often takes away the originality of the host country. The ethnic dish is tampered to match the taste of foreign customers and local languages are given less importance due to monetary benefits associated with learning a foreign language to serve the clients. Thus, to some extent, it is true that international tourism can spoil the culture and environment of the nation.
In conclusion, I pen down saying that although international tourism has a small impact on culture; at the same time, it has ample of benefits. The culture can be preserved with little efforts of local people and it does not require to ban the international tourists exploring the country, which boosts the countries economy and binds the people to live in a diversified culture. Hence, without qualms, the advantages of international tourism outweigh its disadvantages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 89, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Due
...nterest in traveling to foreign places. due to this phenomenon, the indigenous cult...
^^^
Line 8, column 408, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'tourists'' or 'tourist's'?
Suggestion: tourists'; tourist's
...enic beauty of the place. Moreover, the tourists interaction often takes away the origin...
^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 234, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'banning'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: banning
...of local people and it does not require to ban the international tourists exploring th...
^^^^^^
Line 11, column 308, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...exploring the country, which boosts the countries economy and binds the people to live in...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, hence, however, if, moreover, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, in other words, it is true, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2041.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 374.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45721925134 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0284015477 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566844919786 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 633.6 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 12.0 2.52805611222 475% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.195542308 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1904761905 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8095238095 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.04761904762 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255918192828 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.068679643802 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564806330294 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139475201149 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343678719281 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.09 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.