Many people believe that it’s better to learn something in a group rather than individually. Do you agree or disagree?
Learning plays a significant aspect of many lives. While some recommend that, if we tend to learn in groups it will be more helpful, others defend the other side of the spectrum. I completely agree with the assertion and it is the activity which is set to continue not only in many students but also in other organizations.
Even though group learning is a bit monotonous, it would be completely foolish not to recognize the benefits that provide. It is an effective way to complete the task or master on the subject. As it helps in achieving the results faster, most of the companies propose the employees to learn in groups so that, individuals in the group can be assigned to a particular task and can share the knowledge to others.
Despite every individual in a group, studies a specific part of the subject, by sharing the information to others, everyone in the group can master in that. It is the most convenient way to complete the course or subject. Besides, it is a thoughtful way that, no one can stop when there is a qualm because there is a team involved in the studies. This can be exemplified in most of the Indian government schools; teachers encourage students to study in groups, so, even if the teacher is not present in the class, others in the group can clear the doubts. In stark contrast, the benefits of group learning cannot be underestimated.
All in all, group learning is a powerful approach to be considered by many organizations. As it enhances the efficiency of providing better results and convenient to the group. I strongly agree that group studying is better than individual study
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 246, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...studying is better than individual study
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1350.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7703180212 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83807402759 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508833922261 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 413.1 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7855133611 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4285714286 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2142857143 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.35714285714 7.06120827912 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183869146446 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0749695702581 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544586283323 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134337379915 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0677648433934 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.