Many people believe that media coverage of celebrities is having a negative effect on children.
To what extent do you agree?
You should write at least 250 words.
Undoubtedly, a slight portion of the populace anticipates that media broadcast about the renowned personalities endows the adverse influence on young spectators. Conversely, I vocalize the fact that the life journey of star often inspires the youngsters by persuading them to work hard whereas philanthropic gestures by celebrities do instill the virtues of noble citizen among them.
Since media minutely displays about the lifestyle, acts, wealth and habits of celebs, thus this stardom acts as motivational factors for children by equipping them with self-esteem and zeal to perform profoundly at their own level. Seemingly, wavering minds easily get attracted towards the footprints of great celebrities and they embark to imitate their moves. As a result of this imitation, they develop their hidden talents and turn out to be versatile personalities. Moreover, it would be reckless to overlook the fact published by BBC that the undue press coverage of biography of legendary cricketer named 'Sachin Tendulkar' has motivated millions of children to choose sports as career in India. Therefore, ultra luxuries allure the children to intensify their efforts in order to thrive for greener pasture.
On the top of that, even though celebrities spend lavishly on unproductive things still a good range of stars donate a major chunk of their income for the aiding of underprivileged people and devote colossal amount of time in social activities. Indeed, their acts, songs, films, and volunteer communal works always set an example of humane gesture and inspire children to work for the welfare of deprived people. To illustrate, as per the report rendered by 'The New York Times', in the gone calendar year, charitable activities by the famous Hollywood Star named Tom Cruise has encouraged the children to donate their pocket money to the flood victims in the U.S.A.
To conclude, although up to some extent exposure about the life of renowned persons promote negative concerns among children but somehow it turns them into industrious personalities. Observing the life of favorite star would always inculcate ample positive habits among children.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, if, look, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, whereas, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 13.1623246493 15% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1822.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42261904762 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83223267937 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642857142857 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 92.6918827296 49.4020404114 188% => OK
Chars per sentence: 165.636363636 106.682146367 155% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.5454545455 20.7667163134 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.72727272727 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103754798048 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0351616647537 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0168414839814 0.0667982634062 25% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0595511565848 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.011518096948 0.056905535591 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.4 13.0946893788 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 50.2224549098 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.75 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.58 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.