Finding the best approach to spending money in life is a controversial issue. Although contested by many that the matter of saving money for the future is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly negative by a substantial number of individuals. This essay is going to debate both points of views and then determine my own perspective as a person who agrees with saving money for the future self.
Saving money for the future might have enormous positive impacts not only on future life but also on person's development in the present time. It means a person who neglects spending money irrationally, has a great self-control skill which others need to make commitment devices in order to achieve or improve this trait. Additionally, it is quite evident that saving money could be beneficial as a pension for the retirement time or as a jobless for finding another job. A good illustration for that could be the increase rate of welfare that pensioners have in Iran because of their wisely spending money in their past.
Otherwise, some people possibly considered that extreme saving is a disease when you cannot enjoy your life. Undoubtedly human beings hate losing stuff, so this notion of loss aversion kicks in when it comes to saving too. So people resist saving money due to the fact that they have loss aversion and frame mentally saving for retirement as a loss. For instance, young generation believes that being spender is a key role of having immediate gratification such as impulse shopping or buying their favorite car because they do not have to cut spending or give up their tendencies.
To conclude, While there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of being a save far outweigh its drawbacks. In my point of view having a balance and defining a budget not only allow you to have immediate gratification at present but also lead you to act wisely for the future life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 102, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...cts not only on future life but also on persons development in the present time. It mea...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, while, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1624.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92121212121 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70529868129 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569696969697 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.7970605978 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.923076923 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3846153846 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.07692307692 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295705046665 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103680045888 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0391509991435 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17256463461 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0359141952094 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.