Many people believe that university students should study a full range of subjects, instead of some specific subjects.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this viewpoint?
Comprehensive knowledge gives a fruitful result. Most people thinks graduating students at university must learn a variety of subjects despite to limit to one particular area of subject. In my view, I agree, institutions should educate students a full range of engineering subjects. However, learning intricacies will lead to losing students interest. In this essay, let us examine both the sides of my opinion.
Certainly, knowledge is wealth. However, expecting Universal outcome of students is something searching for a unicorn with horn. For example, computer science engineering student could be thought with many associated engineering subjects such as Electronical Engineering, Digital Device Engineering etc,. because these subjects are related to each other by hardware and software. Thus, it takes career advantage for future endeavors. In other words, unassociated topics may route to reluctance. For instance, Civil Engineering and Mechanical Engineering for Computer Science Engineering pupil is a wage.
In contrast, Known is a drop, unknown is an ocean. That is, having some basis level of knowledge would certainly grab an opportunity in this competitive world. To cite an example, the eminent information technology industry thus created helpful virtual software to build high raise building. These virtual blue prints therefore makes the designer to see the real outcome without any major flaws or consequences. In other words, some level of knowledge on Civil engineering for an information technology students led to develop a useful software for Civil architects.
In conclusion, I agree to some extent university should include a wide range of syllabus for students. Nonetheless, they should realize the students should not be overloaded beyond the capacity. Thus, the subjects should be selected according to the demand in the labour market.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 303, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...ineering, Digital Device Engineering etc,. because these subjects are related to e...
^^
Line 3, column 306, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Because
...ering, Digital Device Engineering etc,. because these subjects are related to each othe...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, may, nonetheless, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, in my view, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67615658363 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00637822833 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633451957295 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.2033600633 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.75 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.05 20.7667163134 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227141636772 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612010439585 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661299473925 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145823967733 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0785315283638 0.056905535591 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 40.34 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.07 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.