Career is everyone's first priority in today's fast paced world. People want a stable and more economically well paid job so it happens that many employees are frequently changing their workplace for a better handsome amount. While some still belief in a fixed good income job with no hazzle of transfer or issues. Both have their own pros and cons and will be discussed in detail ahead.
For ambitious and opportunist workers there is always not enough to hold them at one place. They always long for a more beneficial and prosperous option with less work and more demanding position. It is a great thing as their present is always more fruitful and even future is even brighter with more choices and the growth that they have will get them whatever they desire. More skills will be mastered by them increasing their chances to reach the top in a shorter span of time. Moreover, employers love traits like these as they will make the company reach a milestone and office environment will be more competitive in a healthy way. In this case a career boost is possible because of the hunger to grow and acquire more in a limited time.
But, this is risky too as all that glitters is not gold. The saying is perfect in this scenario as if job seekers make shifts in work so often it will hamper the longevity and goodwill of the company. As, it will send a wrong message that the particular company is not a great place to be associated with. Although, it is nice to get opportunities and take them but sometimes this may cause stress for the particular person as if the new work environment is not a worthy place and more stressful, this will also be included in that guy's resume because the efficiency of that employee will also deteoriate. Further, all the bosses will see this as a negative trait as the frequent jumpshift will ruin the future possibilities because it will create an impression of low stability and less trustworthiness of that employee. Moreover, if in the future he wants to stick to one job it won't be possible because of his monotonous changing habit which makes the workplace for him quiet boring.
In the end, it is in the hands of the particular person whether to change the job for a better wage and some extra perks all the time to grow and reach a certain pedestal in life. But, change is not great always as it will hamper the reputation of that person because the boss still wants employee for his longevity over quality.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 620, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a healthy way" with adverb for "healthy"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ce environment will be more competitive in a healthy way. In this case a career boost is possibl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 201, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... longevity and goodwill of the company. As, it will send a wrong message that the ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, moreover, so, still, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2014.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 439.0 315.596192385 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58769931663 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49707982689 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492027334852 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 632.7 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.9580568636 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.888888889 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3888888889 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.27777777778 7.06120827912 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135986999131 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0473773768684 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0401506921375 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0989715012973 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0413253520372 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 50.2224549098 128% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 12.4159519038 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.