Many people support use of animals for testing medicines for humans. Others believe it isn’t appropriate to use animals for such experiments. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
From recent couple of decades humans have endured a dramatic shift in the advancements of medical technologies, and to do these trails scientists will often use animals at first. One portion of people supports this approach, while others are against this. This essay will attempt to study both the viewpoints and provide an opinion.
One of the foremost important reasons to conduct these experiments on animals is the attributes of animals. Many animals have the same characteristics of humans and some have greater immunity power to sustain the composition of chemical compounds. As the animals which are involved in these trails are mostly cloned animals such as; monkeys, rats and sometimes frogs, reproducing these animals are easy. For example, it takes 1.2 millimeters of tissue to clone a rat which is used in experiments. In brief, the variables of an animal which are almost identical to humans make that creature an ideal body to conduct experiments.
On the other hand there are factions of people who are opposing use of terrestrial animal in medical trails. As the pain of humans and animals is same, the animals are been tortured in the name of experiments. Furthermore some animals are dying in the process of these medical analyses because of heavy use of reactive substances. It is said that one-third of wild monkeys are dies all around the world due to medical tests. One more point worth considering is that some animals are addicted to these medicines and cannot sustain without them, as a result they have several mental health problems. An addictive experiment that conducted on a chimpanzee showed a drastic change in the mental behavior of it when they stopped cigarettes. These are the ultra prominent reason for some people to oppose animals for medical testing.
Weighing up both sides of the argument, some say that using animals for medical purpose ease the outcomes of the experiment and others say it is not appropriate to use animals as they are also living beings. As far as I am concerned, I stand on the same side of the experts, who say that for medical reason we should not use any animals. As technologies in medical field are swifting towards 10th generation and with all super computers we have now, we can able to test on years we can do testing on bio-artificial organisms
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 210, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...en tortured in the name of experiments. Furthermore some animals are dying in the process o...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, third, while, for example, in brief, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1930.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 392.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92346938776 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71255411238 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520408163265 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 634.5 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9769260681 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.222222222 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7777777778 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38888888889 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319494186275 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104073592677 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0765933241688 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189651469767 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0406005158088 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.