Nowadays, work from home trend has changed the culture of many offices. However, despite not interaction with colleagues and real-working environment, I still believe that the benefits we gain from this trend outweigh the drawbacks.
On the one hand, I concede that by doing work from home, people can’t get the real working environment. In offices, employees generally have allocated seats or cabins, where they do all of their work. It could be argued that they usually finish their work much quicker at offices than homes due to less or no distractions. Another downside is the response time of any question. Employees can take help from their fellow-mates in no time if they are seating together in the office, whereas they must set-up a meeting to get the answer to any query if doing work from home. Hence, this working from home trend can hamper the productivity of working professionals.
However, although the downsides of working from home are a real concern, I feel that there are more reasons for us to support this culture. Firstly, people can spend more time with their family by doing work from home. Taking care of children can also be done by themselves. A good illustration of this is Google, where around 60% of employees do work from home for the wellbeing of their children. Moreover, people can keep themselves away from the traffic by adapting working from home culture as the roads generally get overcrowded during peak hours. So, employees can use their time more productively by staying at home. Thus, working from home trend can be advantageous for employees as they can spend more time with their family and avoid road traffic.
In conclusion, although I admit that people can’t meet face to face with their colleagues if they do work from home, they can spend more time with their family and can do more work by staying at home. Therefore, I agree that working from home has more advantages than disadvantages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 289, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...has more advantages than disadvantages.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, well, whereas, i feel, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1631.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94242424242 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64328766822 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.484848484848 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4484071667 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.9411764706 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4117647059 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.82352941176 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.418286493988 0.244688304435 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.187778664582 0.084324248473 223% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0910035774302 0.0667982634062 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.302355161121 0.151304729494 200% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0729087159843 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.