The hypothesis among the people who believes to spend money on the research of outer space is quite good mo of government where it is claimed to invest fund in this initiative is futile.
People learn from the nature in other words whatever the human beings have accomplished up to today is resulted to the depth study of environment. Thus, even the earth is also parts of nature that can provide significant data about the foundation of our planet. This approach can broad scientific field and give scope to do more study on it which helps to enhance people life. Even it clears all the bias of scientific thesis are made in past. for instance, recently the image of black hole has been showed in every communicating medium, which provides evidence and support to two scientists who made the hypothesis about it. That is proven by this image. In addition it provides many benefits to people such as GPS facility, oversee on weather attitude and other environment related information.
On this contrary, the fun has been allotted to this kind of project is reckless. The amount should be used for other matters which are really serious. There are abundance people who does not get even drinking water and do not have sanitation facilities which causes so many deaths in every year. This could be prevented by using this amount on this problem and do endeavour to provide basic necessities. Another factor is education there are a many nation which do not have prominent facilities of school life school buildings and benches which can be improved to invest money on this appropriate place. To illustrate my study report was shown in newspaper about the South Africa where major countryside places does not have such amenities however that teachers teach students under the tree and try to give taste of education such kind things are needed heed from develop nations so they could take all from this problem.
in conclusion this both approach is relative Lee crucial in the on matter but to keep prominent human needs I opine that to fulfill urgent requirement is essential and it is their fundamental right to have such basic facilities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 364, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... more study on it which helps to enhance people life. Even it clears all the bias...
^^
Line 3, column 437, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
... the bias of scientific thesis are made in past. for instance, recently the image of bl...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 446, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
... of scientific thesis are made in past. for instance, recently the image of black h...
^^^
Line 3, column 661, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...ut it. That is proven by this image. In addition it provides many benefits to people suc...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 386, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...his problem and do endeavour to provide basic necessities. Another factor is education there are ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 445, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun nation seems to be countable; consider using: 'many nations'.
Suggestion: many nations
...Another factor is education there are a many nation which do not have prominent facilities ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 450, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'nations'?
Suggestion: nations
...er factor is education there are a many nation which do not have prominent facilities ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...ey could take all from this problem. in conclusion this both approach is relati...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, really, so, thus, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1783.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 365.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88493150685 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53307488649 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561643835616 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.971230478 49.4020404114 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.866666667 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73333333333 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106464281777 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0377468071886 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054198044193 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0846111336602 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0740355427052 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.